« Violence never solves anything. » In this article, I aim to examine this contentious statement. On the surface it would seem true. People often resort to violence in order to settle a dispute, but victory does not always bring a real end to the problem. . Second, most violence does not destroy the enemy entirely.
Not all violence is illegal or illegitimate. Violent acts are sometimes necessary in order to protect the human rights of other people. . All persons have a right to peace so that they can fully develop all their capacities, physical, intellectual, moral and spiritual, without being the target of any kind of violence.
Can you justify your action just because of violence?
As Self-Defense The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. . In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified.
Why is violence so important?
Violence affects a significant proportion of the population. It threatens the lives and physical and mental health of millions of people, overburdens health systems, undermines human capital formation, and slows economic and social development.
Can you justify your actions just because of violence?
As Self-Defense The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. . In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified.
Can violence be morally justified?
Though acts of violence are at least prima facie wrong, circumstances can arise where, even in democracies, some of them are morally justified.
Does fighting solve problems?
The conflicts are never really resolved, though there may be periods of relative peace in between the fights. . The important point to remember is that fighting causes damage, but never creates peace or solves problems. “Fighting” and “dealing with an issue” are two distinctly different processes.
Is violence ever justified?
Though acts of violence are at least prima facie wrong, circumstances can arise where, even in democracies, some of them are morally justified.
Which is better violence or nonviolence?
Recent quantitative research has demonstrated that nonviolent strategies are twice as effective as violent ones. Organized and disciplined nonviolence can disarm and change the world – and our lives, our relationships and our communities.
Can you justify your actions just because of violence Why?
If you justify an act of violence by saying that you are in a fight and are therefore fighting back, the justification is a bad one if you are not entitled to take yourself to be in a fight. Fighting back is justified relative to a practice of being in a fight, but is only absolutely justified if that practice is.
Can war ever be justified?
A war is only just if it is fought for a reason that is justified, and that carries sufficient moral weight. The country that wishes to use military force must demonstrate that there is a just cause to do so. . Sometimes a war fought to prevent a wrong from happening may be considered a just war.
Is War ethical or unethical?
A war might be ethical but the means unethical, for instance, using landmines, torture, chemicals and current debate is concerned with drones. Just War theory sets out principles for a war to be ethical. The war must be: Waged by a legitimate authority (usually interpreted as states)
Why is war morally wrong?
War is a bad thing because it involves deliberately killing or injuring people, and this is a fundamental wrong – an abuse of the victims’ human rights.
How can violence be justified?
As Self-Defense The most plausible justification of violence is when it is perpetrated in return of other violence. . In its mildest form, the argument in favor of violence as self-defense claims that to violence of some sort, an equally violent response may be justified.
What does the ethics of war mean?
The ethics of war explores the moral limits and possibilities of conflict. The argument proceeds from a just war standpoint which balances rules or principles against the moral capacities and dispositions of belligerents and the particular circumstances in which they act.
Is violence ever the answer?
Overall, violence is almost never the right answer because it brings in more violence, affects younger generations in negative ways and because there are always alternative responses. Learning to act and respond in nonviolent ways can not only ease a conflict but even save lives.
How can I fight with my problems?
– Solve the problem. Sometimes it’s as easy as that. .
– Avoid the problem. There just may be some things on that to-do list that will go away if you wait long enough. .
– Cut the problem down to size. .
– Address an underlying issue. .
– Cope with the problem. .
– Try again.
Last Review : 11 days ago.
Don’t forget to share this post !
References