So you should never use “works” to describe the work you do when you’re sitting at a desk. “Works” can also be used to mean an industrial plant, e.g. Over two hundred people are employed at the works. It may be used in combination with other words, e.g. “ironworks”, “steelworks”, “gasworks”.
Likewise, Is that work or works?
The correct one is « something that works ». A verb after « something » should be in the third person singular form, yes. 3rd person singular verb should match the 3rd person singular noun.
Also, Are you available polite?
We use « would you be available. » It’s a more polite way to ask. Instead of, « Are you available? » « Would you be available » sounds a little more formal.
Secondly, Is it will be OK for you?
Would (something) be OK? This is a good, friendly way to ask for permission to do something. You can use this phrase when asking for permission from a boss, a teacher, a parent, or anyone who has authority over you.
Furthermore Is formal for you OK? It’s not informal, but also isn’t formal, and while it isn’t exactly how I’d phrase it (as a native speaker) it’s grammatically correct. A slight correction, normally we would say « Is it okay with you if… »
Where do you work answer?
You can say « I work at a hospital » and « I work in a hospital ». Both are equally correct. You can say « I work at McDonalds », but it’s incorrect to say « I work in McDonalds ». You can say « I work in New York City », but it’s incorrect to say « I work at New York City ».
Do you work in or at?
You work in a type of place such as a bank, shop, or factory: She works in a library. You work at a particular place or organization: She works at the Library of Congress.
Would you or will you?
Would: How They’re Different (and How to Use Each) The main difference between will and would is that would can be used in the past tense but will cannot. Also, would is commonly used to refer to a future event that may occur under specific conditions, while will is used more generally to refer to future events.
What time works best for you answer?
Examples of the Best Answers
- I am available to work Monday through Friday, and I am very flexible about the start and end times on those days. …
- I’m available during school hours while my children are at school, 9 am – 3 pm, Monday through Friday. …
- I’m flexible and available just about any time you need me to work.
Why everyone is not are?
Originally Answered: Is it ‘Everyone is’ or ‘Everyone are’ ? Everyone is. This is because it is a combination of every and one, so technically, the one is the subject here and it is singular. A lot of people use the word everyone to mean a majority of people, but linguistically, the word is singular.
Is it okay or OK?
It’s okay (with the apostrophe) is correct. In English Grammar, its is used to show possession, such as : The cow was sleeping in the shed and its calf was sleeping beside it. But, it’s stands for “it is” or “it has” or “it was”. In this case, “it’s okay” actually means “it is okay”.
Is OK is OK?
Okay and OK mean the same thing.
You have the answers to the questions. There’s no difference between OK and okay. The older term, OK, (possibly) derived from an abbreviation for an intentional misspelling of “all correct.” The terms are both standard English.
Is Okay formal?
So, what’s the bottom line? Both “okay” and “ok” are acceptable spellings in formal writing; which one you should use simply comes down to your preferred style guide (or, if you aren’t tied to one, your personal preference).
Is Okay more formal than OK?
Okay and OK are two acceptable spellings of the same word. In formal writing, follow the requirements of your style guide. You have the answers to the questions. There’s no difference between OK and okay.
How do you say OK in a formal way?
Synonyms & Antonyms of OK
- agreeable,
- all right,
- alright,
- copacetic.
- (also copasetic or copesetic),
- ducky,
- fine,
- good,
What are your weaknesses?
Here are a few examples of the best weaknesses to mention in an interview:
- I focus too much on the details. …
- I have a hard time letting go of a project. …
- I have trouble saying “no.” …
- I get impatient when projects run beyond the deadline. …
- I could use more experience in… …
- I sometimes lack confidence.
How do you answer why should I hire you?
How to Answer Why Should We Hire You
- Show that you have skills and experience to do the job and deliver great results. …
- Highlight that you’ll fit in and be a great addition to the team. …
- Describe how hiring you will make their life easier and help them achieve more.
What is your weakness best answer?
My greatest weakness is that I am a shy and nervous person by nature. The result is that I have a difficult time speaking up in groups. Even if I have good ideas, I have trouble asserting them. Often I keep them to myself.
Do you say I work for or I work with?
« I work for » sounds like you have a boss at Microsoft, whereas « I work with » sounds as if you work alongside people at Microsoft, but do not report to anyone. « I work with » can mean the same thing as « I work for » but it can be slightly ambiguous.
Is it I work at or I work with?
If you’re physically describing the place where you work (gas station; bank; factory), you should say ‘I work at’. But note that you then need to add ‘a’ or ‘the’ after ‘at’. If you’re naming the person/entity who/that employs you, you should substitute ‘for’ for ‘at’ (and in that case do NOT add ‘a’ or ‘the’).
Which is correct I work with or I work for?
To work for a company means you are compensated by that company to do a job, to be emplyed by that company. To work with means you are working in association with the company, usually on equal footing, not necessarily employed by that company.
Will you or would you marry me?
Will you marry me‘ is a direct question, and when you ask it, you are literally asking someone if they would commit themselves to you at that moment, and it requires an answer. ‘Would you marry me’ is a vague question that asks of possiblities.
Would and will use?
And English learners often get these two confused because they’re used in very similar situations. But they’re not the same. The main difference between will and would is that will is used for real possibilities while would is used for imagined situations in the future.
Which is more polite can you or could you?
To answer the question: « could » definitely sounds slightly more polite than « can » to a native speaker since it is less direct and more deferential as a result. « Could » is a form of « can », so both are technically asking « are you able to… ». This is not the difference between the two.
Don’t forget to share this post on Facebook and Twitter !